Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2084 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 68% better in FIFA 23 than Core i5-6400 - 235 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$135.02 vs CA$400.1
- Up to 44% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i9-11900K - CA$0.96 vs CA$1.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
235
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.7/FPS
56%
Price, CA$
CA$400.1
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$400.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5201 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
140
59%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$135.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$135.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |