Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 245 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 144 vs 135 FPS
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - CA$378.88 vs CA$4967.05
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 64 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$378.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
135
93.75%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$4967.05
7%
Buy for CA$4,967.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
76.23215108245049%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 32 |
16 | Threads | 64 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |