Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 203 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$542.6 vs CA$1393.07
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900 - 32 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$542.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76560 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
181
89.16256157635468%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
38%
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76561 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
54.97652582159625%
Multi-Core
7539
85.51497277676951%
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |