Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 564 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 186% better in League of Legends than Celeron G4900 - 197 vs 69 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 36 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - CA$108.0 vs CA$700.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i9-10980XE - CA$1.57 vs CA$3.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 54 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10980XE doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
197
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.55/FPS
44.225352112676056%
Price, CA$
CA$700
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$700 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1659 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
69
35.025380710659896%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.57/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1658 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
39.23566878980892%
Multi-Core
1051
8.769294952023362%
Intel Core i9-10980XE | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Celeron |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |