Buy on Amazon
CA$700
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 2321 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 38% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-9590 - 126 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 165 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 36 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - CA$340.0 vs CA$700.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Core i9-10980XE - CA$3.74 vs CA$5.56 per FPS
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-10980XE
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
126
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.56/FPS
67.26618705035972%
Price, CA$
CA$700
48%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9 i9-10980XE Octadeca-core (18 Core) 3 GHz Processor - 24.75 MB Cache - 4.60 GHz Overclocking Speed - 14 nm - 165 W - 36 Threads
Buy for CA$700 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
91
72.22222222222221%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$340
100%
Value Winner
AMD FD9590FHHKWOF Fx-9590 OEM-Series 8-Core Processor Black Edition
Buy for CA$340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-10980XE
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10980XE | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | FX |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 8 |
36 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
