Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 194 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 0% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10920X - 402 vs 401 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - CA$329.49 vs CA$1213.11
- Up to 73% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10920X - CA$0.82 vs CA$3.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$1,213.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10156 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
402
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$329.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |