Buy on Amazon
CA$834
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-3820 - 134 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - CA$110.0 vs CA$834.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-10900X - CA$0.92 vs CA$6.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 130 vs 165 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.22/FPS
14%
Price, CA$
CA$834
13%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900X Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 4.7GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (BX8069510900X)
Buy for CA$834 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
119
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$110
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core Processor 3.6 GHz 10 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73820
Buy for CA$110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
