Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 1873 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-8370 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - CA$220.0 vs CA$834.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i9-10900X - CA$1.16 vs CA$4.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.39/FPS
26%
Price, CA$
CA$834
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$834 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
189
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$220
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |