Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 157 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 154 vs 153 FPS
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - CA$389.22 vs CA$2287.88
- Up to 83% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - CA$2.53 vs CA$14.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 125 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 64 vs 20 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$389.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$389.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
153
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$14.95/FPS
16%
Price, CA$
CA$2287.88
17%
Buy for CA$2,287.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 32 |
20 | Threads | 64 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |