Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8350 - 363 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - CA$209.7 vs CA$400.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-10900KF - CA$0.66 vs CA$1.1 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
363
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.1/FPS
60%
Price, CA$
CA$400
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 234 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
319
87.87878787878788%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$209.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$209.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |