Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900K - 145 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - CA$319.02 vs CA$699.84
- Up to 57% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900K - CA$2.2 vs CA$5.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for CA$699.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8795 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$319.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$319.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8795 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |