Buy on Amazon
CA$699.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 17% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G4900 - 118 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - CA$49.99 vs CA$699.99
- Up to 92% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-10900K - CA$0.49 vs CA$5.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
118
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.93/FPS
8%
Price, CA$
CA$699.99
7%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900K Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for CA$699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
101
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
