Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 33% better in FIFA 23 than Core i3-4160 - 181 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$36.99 vs CA$377.99
- Up to 87% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.27 vs CA$2.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.07/FPS
13.043478260869568%
Price, CA$
CA$377.99
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$377.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
136
75.13812154696133%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
63.48448687350835%
Multi-Core
2072
24.590553050083074%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |