Buy on Amazon
CA$396.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3623 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 28% better in Dota 2 than Core i7-875K - 216 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - CA$112.0 vs CA$396.99
- Up to 64% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i9-10900 - CA$0.66 vs CA$1.84 per FPS
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
216
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.84/FPS
35%
Price, CA$
CA$396.99
28%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$396.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
169
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core I7-875K I7 875K I7 875 2.933 GHz Used Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
