Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Ryzen 3 2200G - 203 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - CA$260.0 vs CA$659.99
- Up to 85% better value when playing Control than Core i9-10900 - CA$0.5 vs CA$3.25 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.25/FPS
15.384615384615385%
Price, CA$
CA$659.99
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$659.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
201
99.01477832512316%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$260
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
997
58.509389671361504%
Multi-Core
2858
33.93896211851324%
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |