Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 245 days older than the cheaper Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - CA$611.76 vs CA$2000.0
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-10850K - 194 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10850K - 64 vs 20 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
181
93.29896907216495%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$611.76
100%
Buy for CA$611.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76712 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$2000
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,000 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76712 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Single-Core
1636
94.02298850574712%
Multi-Core
14008
100%
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 32 |
20 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |