Buy on Amazon
CA$3,200.92
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9800X outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9800X is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9800X
- Performs up to 17% better in World of Warcraft than FX-4300 - 182 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 99% cheaper than Core i7-9800X - CA$36.09 vs CA$3200.92
- Up to 99% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-9800X - CA$0.23 vs CA$17.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-9800X - 95 vs 165 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-9800X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
182
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$17.59/FPS
1.3075611142694712%
Price, CA$
CA$3200.92
1%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-9800X X-Series Processor 8 Cores Up to 4.4GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 3.8 BX80673I79800X
Buy for CA$3,200.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3670 minutes ago
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
155
85.16483516483517%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3665 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-9800X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9800X | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
