Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2373 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 21% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-4300 - 131 vs 108 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - CA$36.09 vs CA$401.6
- Up to 89% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-9700F - CA$0.33 vs CA$3.07 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
131
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.07/FPS
10.749185667752444%
Price, CA$
CA$401.6
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$401.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1544 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
108
82.44274809160305%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1539 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |