Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2750 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Valorant than FX-4100 - 792 vs 680 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - CA$31.73 vs CA$400.98
- Up to 90% better value when playing Valorant than Core i7-9700F - CA$0.05 vs CA$0.51 per FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
792
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
9.803921568627452%
Price, CA$
CA$400.98
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$400.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
680
85.85858585858585%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.05/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$31.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$31.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |