Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 4216 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 32% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-940XM - 292 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 20 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
292
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$339
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |