Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 4581 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 39% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-940XM - 158 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 24 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$507.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$507.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 120 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |