Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 2442 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-920XM - 104 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920XM - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
104
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$248.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$248.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920XM | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |