Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3943 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - CA$153.98 vs CA$619.98
- Up to 73% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-11600 - CA$0.67 vs CA$2.46 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-880 - 252 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
230
91.26984126984127%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3897 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
252
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.46/FPS
27.23577235772358%
Price, CA$
CA$619.98
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$619.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3906 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
24.50518378887842%
Multi-Core
1653
20.18808011724475%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |