Key Differences
In short — Core i7-880 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-880 is 877 days older than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Performs up to 10% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than FX-8320 - 44 vs 40 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i7-880 - CA$111.14 vs CA$153.98
- Up to 21% better value when playing Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Core i7-880 - CA$2.78 vs CA$3.5 per FPS
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
44
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.5/FPS
79.42857142857143%
Price, CA$
CA$153.98
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$153.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
40
90.9090909090909%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$111.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Lynnfield | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |