Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-880 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-880 is 877 days older than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 18% cheaper than FX-6300 - CA$153.98 vs CA$187.01
- Up to 17% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than FX-6300 - CA$1.56 vs CA$1.89 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1585 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.89/FPS
82.53968253968254%
Price, CA$
CA$187.01
82%
Buy for CA$187.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1586 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Lynnfield | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |