Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 12% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-4330 - 186 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - CA$63.33 vs CA$322.05
- Up to 78% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-8700 - CA$0.38 vs CA$1.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
186
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.73/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$322.05
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$322.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2124 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
166
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$63.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$63.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700 | vs | Intel Core i3-4330 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |