Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2893 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$70.68 vs CA$280.74
- Up to 72% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$0.38 vs CA$1.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 8% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-860 - 203 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 24 vs 8 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
188
92.61083743842364%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$70.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$70.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44061 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.38/FPS
27.536231884057973%
Price, CA$
CA$280.74
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$280.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44062 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Lynnfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |