Key Differences
In short — Core i7-860 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-860 is 1084 days older than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Lynnfield | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |