Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1837 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-840QM - 134 vs 127 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-840QM doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
134
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$228.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$228.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12470 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |