Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 2664 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Core i3-8350K - 45 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 7% better in Rocket League than Core i7-840QM - 720 vs 671 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-840QM doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i7-840QM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Core i3-8350K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
