Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 3670 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 45 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-840QM - 125 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-840QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$575
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$575 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |