Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3872 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 23% better in New World than Core i7-820QM - 119 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 16 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
119
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.94/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$349.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$349.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13016 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |