Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4851 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 21% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-820QM - 383 vs 316 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
383
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$288.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$288.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |