Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i7-8086K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2043 days newer than Core i7-8086K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8086K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 35% better in Starfield than Core i7-8086K - 85 vs 63 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8086K - 32 vs 12 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
85
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$658
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$658 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1540 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
Single-Core
1673
55.39735099337748%
Multi-Core
6973
38.1663929939792%
Intel Core i7-8086K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 40th | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |