Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8086K outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8086K is 2010 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8086K
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1610 - 136 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8086K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jun 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 40th | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |