Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms Core i7-7920HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 994 days newer than Core i7-7920HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7920HQ
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-7920HQ - 182 vs 174 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7920HQ | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |