Buy on Amazon
CA$2,000
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1999
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i7-7820X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 882 days newer than Core i7-7820X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 140 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Core i7-7820X - 185 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820X - 64 vs 16 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$2000
100%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core, 64-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor, without Cooler
Buy for CA$2,000 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77862 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Single-Core
1411
86.24694376528117%
Multi-Core
7849
56.03226727584237%
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 16 | Threads | 64 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
