Buy on Amazon
CA$187.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 1019 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - CA$187.88 vs CA$834.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i9-10900X - CA$2.47 vs CA$10.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i7-7700 - 80 vs 76 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 20 vs 8 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
76
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$187.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80677I77700 7th Generation Core i7-7700 Processor
Buy for CA$187.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
80
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$10.43/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$834
22%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900X Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 4.7GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (BX8069510900X)
Buy for CA$834 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
