Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 871 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - CA$588.88 vs CA$774.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900X - CA$4.56 vs CA$5.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 140 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6950X - 133 vs 129 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
129
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$588.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$588.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18104 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
133
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.82/FPS
78%
Price, CA$
CA$774
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$774 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |