Buy on Amazon
CA$407.53
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1089
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1089
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 273 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Pentium G4400 - 125 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$39.99 vs CA$407.53
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel BX80671I76900K Boxed Core i7-6900K Processor, Gray
Buy for CA$407.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Intel BX80662G4400 Pentium Processor G4400, 3.3 GHz
Buy for CA$39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-6900K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
694
55.43130990415336%
Multi-Core
1184
16.63388592301208%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Pentium |
| Broadwell-E | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
