Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 688 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 5 2600X - 235 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$125.0 vs CA$389.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-6900K - CA$0.53 vs CA$1.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
235
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.66/FPS
31.927710843373497%
Price, CA$
CA$389.99
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$389.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44045 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
234
99.57446808510639%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$125
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44045 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1237
98.80191693290735%
Multi-Core
5263
73.93930879460522%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |