Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2310 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$188.88 vs CA$389.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13600K - CA$1.48 vs CA$2.49 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6800K - 156 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6800K - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
128
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4963 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
156
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.49/FPS
59%
Price, CA$
CA$389
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$389 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4963 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |