Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 358 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 103 vs 99 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 24 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
103
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$239.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$239.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |