Buy on Amazon
CA$211.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $899
Availability
MSRP in USD: $899
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1095 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$211.77 vs CA$1181.07
- Up to 82% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$1.14 vs CA$6.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Core i7-6700T - 189 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 32 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
185
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$211.77
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for CA$211.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
189
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.25/FPS
18%
Price, CA$
CA$1181.07
17%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Processor (YD2950XA8AFWOF)
Buy for CA$1,181.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
