Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 552 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 22% better in Starfield than Celeron G3930 - 56 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
56
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.83/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$269.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$269.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
47.022428460943544%
Multi-Core
1043
25.193236714975846%
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |