Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Core i7-640M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1443 days newer than Core i7-640M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 29% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-640M - 299 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640M - 12 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |