Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 274 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 19% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G1820 - 134 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
42.32758620689655%
Multi-Core
825
15.157082491273194%
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell E | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
