Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Core i7-4980HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 1977 days newer than Core i7-4980HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4980HQ
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 47 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-4980HQ - 122 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4980HQ - 56 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-4980HQ
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4980HQ | vs | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 3647 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 28 |
| 8 | Threads | 56 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 255 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
