Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4960HQ outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4960HQ is 1023 days older than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4960HQ
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 47 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-4960HQ
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4960HQ | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Crystal Well | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
