Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3172 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-4800MQ - 378 vs 336 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
378
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$209.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$209.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44061 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Single-Core
1031
47.05613874942948%
Multi-Core
3046
34.18630751964085%
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |